Lately, I've been going for regular training runs along the Grand Union Canal and have noticed a large number of aluminium cans littering the area. I find this particularly odd because aluminium cans have a high recycling value and are among the most recycled items worldwide. Despite this, they seem to be among the most prevalent pollutants along the canal, along with plastic and glass bottles, which are also highly recyclable.
People are missing a trick…..
Are there insufficient incentives for recycling? Should the Canal and River Trust consider installing more recycling bins along the canals or even introducing reverse vending machines, or something- we have emailed and await a response. We can develop a project for them that would earn them money, clean up the canals and earn them environmental points from all of us (the most valuable!)
Why Aluminium Cans Are the Most Recycled Item in the World
Aluminium cans hold the title of being the most recycled item globally for several reasons:
1. Economic Value: Aluminum has a high market value. Recycling it is far cheaper than producing new aluminium from raw materials, making it attractive for recycling industries.
2. Energy Efficiency: Recycling aluminium saves up to 95% of the energy required to produce aluminium from bauxite ore. This significant energy saving translates to reduced carbon emissions.
3. Infinite Recyclability: Unlike many other materials, aluminium can be recycled indefinitely without losing its quality or strength. You can’t recycle plastics more than a few times- AND you can’t commingle the different polymers. This makes it a sustainable option for packaging.
4. Widespread Use: Aluminum cans are ubiquitous in our daily lives, from beverages to canned foods, making them a common recyclable item.
The Recycling System for Aluminium Cans in London
London has a well-established recycling system that includes curbside collections, recycling centres, and bottle banks. Local councils provide bins for mixed recycling, which often includes aluminium cans. These are then sorted at Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) where aluminium is separated from other recyclables using advanced technology like eddy current separators.
However, despite these systems, many aluminium cans still end up in the environment, particularly along waterways like the Grand Union Canal. C’mon people!
The Missed Opportunity Along the Canals
The presence of so many discarded aluminium cans along the canals suggests that the current recycling incentives are not effective enough. The Canal and River Trust could indeed be missing a significant opportunity to improve recycling rates and cleanliness along these waterways.
The Potential of Reverse Vending Machines
One solution that has proven effective in other parts of the world is the use of reverse vending machines. These machines accept empty aluminium cans and dispense cash or vouchers in return. Implementing such machines along the Grand Union Canal could provide a direct monetary incentive for people to collect and recycle aluminium cans, reducing litter and promoting recycling.
A Monetary Reward System: A Part of the Solution
Offering a monetary reward for recycling aluminium cans could address several issues simultaneously:
• Litter Reduction: Financial incentives would encourage more people to pick up discarded cans, keeping the canal and surrounding areas cleaner.
• Increased Recycling Rates: Direct rewards would likely boost the overall recycling rate of aluminium cans in London.
• Community Engagement: Such initiatives could foster a greater sense of community responsibility and environmental stewardship.
Conclusion
The frequent sight of aluminium cans littering the Grand Union Canal is a clear indication that current recycling incentives are insufficient. By introducing reverse vending machines or other monetary reward systems, we can tap into the inherent value of aluminium cans to promote better recycling habits. This not only helps in keeping our environment clean but also contributes to a more sustainable and efficient recycling system.
C’mon, Canal and River Trust?!
Comments